the summit

The Rise of AI in Healthcare: What Brokers Need to Know Now

June 16, 2025

The past decade saw the promise of artificial intelligence hover around the edges of healthcare—mostly as experimental tools or startup buzzwords. That’s no longer the case. AI is now embedded in daily clinical practice, and its role is expanding fast.

Primary care physicians use AI-powered symptom checkers to triage incoming patients. Dermatologists rely on image classifiers to flag suspicious moles. Chatbots field appointment requests. Machine learning tools comb electronic health records to flag patients at risk of readmission. And increasingly, clinicians are receiving diagnostic “suggestions” from systems trained on hundreds of thousands of cases.

This is no longer hypothetical, and it’s not confined to large institutions. What began in academic hospitals is now commonplace in outpatient clinics, dental offices, rural practices, and mental health networks. AI’s move into mainstream healthcare is happening faster—and more broadly—than most professionals outside the field realize.

Technology That Doesn’t Sit in the Background

Unlike earlier waves of healthcare tech—billing platforms, scheduling tools, or digital records—today’s AI systems don’t simply support the administrative side of care. They inform, influence, and sometimes initiate medical decisions.

Some AI systems scan imaging results in parallel with human radiologists, surfacing findings a clinician might miss. Others flag potential diagnoses based on Electronic Health Record patterns or natural language from doctor’s notes. A handful are even designed to recommend treatment paths based on a constantly updated stream of clinical data.

What makes this moment so significant is not that these systems exist—it’s that they’re being used. Practices are integrating them into their daily routines, often without formal oversight or policy. In some cases, staff may not fully understand what the tool is doing behind the interface.

Yet trust in the results is often high. These tools are marketed as accurate, data-driven, and objective. They’re also fast—and in a healthcare system strained by time and staffing shortages, fast can be seductive.

Medical malpractive insurance is an often misunderstood, yet critical component in the realm of healthcare. It serves as a protective barrier, not just for medical practitioners against unforeseen legal claims,

Our team is your team.

Get a quote

The Unpredictable Nature of Disruption

As AI’s presence deepens, it’s likely to reshape care delivery in ways we can’t yet predict. Already, its adoption is influencing how providers:

Document patient interactions
Prioritize risk and referrals
Communicate with other care teams
Defend or explain clinical decisions

In many settings, it’s also altering the patient experience. Some patients are more comfortable with AI-assisted triage; others distrust decisions made (or delayed) by a machine. These subtle shifts are adding complexity to workflows and relationships that used to be relatively linear.

Even the definition of medical error is being challenged. If a clinician follows an AI recommendation that later proves harmful, who—or what—is responsible? And if a provider chooses not to use an available, proven AI tool, could that choice eventually be framed as a failure to meet the standard of care?

These are not abstract questions. Courts, regulators, and insurance carriers are beginning to grapple with them now.

What This Means for Brokers

For insurance brokers serving healthcare professionals, AI is no longer something to monitor for future relevance. It’s here. And it’s reshaping the risk landscape in real time.

Every new tool a practice adopts may introduce a fresh liability pathway—especially if it’s used without training, policy, or documentation. As more providers lean on automation, the potential for delayed claims, unclear responsibility, and gaps in coverage will grow.

This doesn’t mean brokers need to become tech experts. But it does mean they need to start asking new kinds of questions—What systems are in place? Who’s using them? How are decisions tracked? Are policies written to accommodate a world where machines influence outcomes?

Most importantly, brokers must recognize what’s at stake—not just for the practices they serve, but for their own ability to advise, protect, and lead in an industry undergoing quiet but seismic change.